Friday, June 15, 2012

Trapeze Americano: the Capitalist Circus & Madagascar 3

Don't do what I did, please, and expect from Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted a show reflecting the trailer; it does have moments of being slightly annoying, however, the film demonstrates the ups and downs of capitalism over the last couple of years in sophisticated array and why it is imperative not to abandon the system. Madagascar 3 does four things extremely well: one, it reminds us what has happened to capitalism the last several years; two, it draws differences between the American and French Revolutions; three, it makes a surprising judgment on what happens in a capitalist system when faith in God is abandoned which leads us into the fourth point, the reasons why the Soviet Union collapsed and how Russia is vital to America today. Yes, this is all in Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted.
This film is very much like a group of immigrants making their way to America, and if they aren't enough for you, then the European Circus they join with should convince you that the American dream is still alive and well in Europe, and that's probably what's meant by Europe's "most wanted": what does Europe most want? A high-standard of living, security, and personal freedom.
The film starts in Africa, and Alex the lion is worried that the penguins, who took off to Monte Carlo, aren't going to come back to Africa to return the gang to their home in New York City. It's Alex's birthday, so the gang formed a mud model of New York City for him: Gloria the hippo becomes the Statue of Liberty, saying, "Give me your huddled masses," (line from the plaque on the statue), there is 5th Avenue and Times Square and the Zoo, their home; what's the point of this? The animals made this from memory, and the exile of the animals is the same as the exile of capitalists; the longing they have for New York City is the longing we have for the traditional American monetary system (please recall, if you will, The Avengers, and how a warhead had been fired at Wall Street but billionaire Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) diverted it and saved Wall Street, i.e., American capitalism).
The penguins, cleaver creatures, made an airplane and flew to Monte Carlo for a "gambling spree." What gambling spree would that be? The Wall Street Crash of 2008, the subject of Margin Call, as well as the greed of corrupt investors such as Bernie Madoff, which prompted films such as The Descendants to call for the end of American capitalism and start socialism (please see Hollywood's Political Scorecard: the Capitalists & Socialists for more). The animals being marooned in the barren grass land of Africa is because New York City is mud, it's not just a model for Alex's birthday, but a sign that--like Alex's nightmare of growing old--capitalism, too, has grown old and is exiled, never to return. Alex decides, however, that it's best to go to Monte Carlo, find the penguins, and force them to return them to NYC.
The penguins in their torn up room in Monte Carlo. They have a pillow fight, one of them ripping open the pillow, feathers flying everywhere and Skipper crying, they are full of baby birds! What does that mean? The humble pillow-stuffing and the guests in the luxury room are the same, birds (i,.e., the upper class) and it's self-destructive to take advantage of the lower-class and think it won't have repercussions on the upper-class, contrariwise is also true.
This is where everything gets really interesting.
The penguins and monkeys have wrecked their room but when we go down to the gambling floor, the monkeys, Phil and Mason, have dressed up like "the King of Versailles" (much more on this below) and are winning all their bets. When Alex sees the Penguins, Skipper asks, "What's New Pussycat?" punning off Alex being a cat (a lion) and the 1965 Peter O'Toole/Woody Allen film of the same name. Why is that important? Peter O'Toole's character plays a womanizer who can't be faithful, even incapable of taking responsibility for his actions at times. Without a doubt, this innuendo and the penguins behavior in wrecking their room demonstrates one of the well-known problems of capitalism: just like Bernie Madoff and Lehman Brothers' unethical actions (to say the least) when greed escalates, capitalism becomes unruly and ugly; that's why there is a need for faith (more on that below).
Alex has a four part plan for Operation: Penguin Extraction: first, get the penguins, then really chew them out for not coming back to get them sooner; then apologize for chewing them out, then get back to New York City. When Alex and Marty the Zebra finally get the penguins to a good spot, Alex asks Marty, where are we in the plan? Marty answers, part three! So Alex immediately apologizes to the penguins, skipping over the beating they deserve. What does this reflect? The Wall Street bailout enacted by the Obama Administration to save those who had brought America into a financial crisis instead of punishing them for poor oversight and a lack of regulation.
Now we can begin the surprising lesson of the film: the differences between the American and French Revolutions. Chantal DuBois is the head of animal control in Monte Carlo and is called in to take care of the threat the gang poses. DuBois, the "crazy" as the penguins call her, is crazy. What do we first see about her? All the "heads" mounted on her wall. What are the French best known for? The French Revolution.  What is the French Revolution best known for? Beheadings. Thousands and thousands were decapitated during the political upheaval, including the "King of Versailles." What DuBois
At times moving like a spider, and other times like a blood-hound, the animal tendencies of DuBois are meant to remind viewers that the Republic of France is officially of no religion, hence, officially, it subscribes to the evolutionary model of the creation of the universe (Darwinism, simply stated but not wholly accurate). Later, when DuBois tries to awaken her injured force, she sings,  Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien, (I Have No Regrets)  made famous by Edith Piaf who was portrayed by Marion Cotillard in La Vie En Rose; in turn, Cotillard also starred in Christopher Nolan's 2010 hit Inception which incorporated the song when the extraction agents have to be woken up. Why is all this important? It counters the evolutionary universe with the chaotic universe. Again, a chaotic universe understands the development of the world in very different terms from evolution which excludes the role/being of God. While chaos does not include God, it does not rule God out in creation. In Madagascar 3, having the French woman DuBois at the inner-most circle of a spiraling set of references based on the song she sings, suggests that the film--along with numerous action sequences--supports a chaotic universe, not the evolutionary one.
While films such as Dark Shadows, The Descendants and The Hunger Games are calling for a French Revolution in the United States to burn down the upper-class and the religious orders, Madagascar 3, however, calls for us to remember why our ancestors and founding fathers chose capitalism as the economic model for America: the freedom to invent. While the intelligent but irresponsible penguins (rather like billionaire Tony Stark of Iron Man fame) are the vehicle (the plane) for the return to New York (the plane crashes and the monkeys working the plane run off because in France, "The labor laws are more lenient and they only work 2 weeks out of the year") it's the re-inventing of the circus from the regular animals (the "middle class") that allows them to fulfill their own dreams and get to America (like the immigrants flocking to Ellis Island). It's the penguins, though, who had the cash to buy (read: invest) the circus so the gang had the chance to get back to America (read: proving that capitalism is still a good working system and needs to be given another chance).
Alex rallying the circus animals to re-invent themselves and helping everyone, like in Moneyball, to understand what their real talent is and use that, not only for greater personal happiness, but for the greater good, as well.
Something quite interesting happens, which brings us to our third point of discussion. King Julien, the lemur, falls in love with Sonya the bear who rides a tricycle. Sonya breaks the tricycle and Julien promises to buy her "something better,"; we see them in Vatican City and Julien kisses the ring of the Pope, stealing the ring off the Pope's hand in his mouth, then Julien and Sonya are on a motorcycle, riding out of a bike shop. Later, the Italian seal lion Stefano tries to pray as Vitaly the Russian tiger is going to do his act and Stefano tries to pray the Hail Mary (uttering Santa Maria, over and over until he can't remember the words and doesn't know what to say) as a prayer to help Vitaly. What does this mean? The "trade in" of faith (the Pope's ring) for material goods (the motorcycle) means that later, when we need God's help, we won't remember how to ask for it (Stefano trying to pray).
Three questions need to be asked about Vitaly the Russian Tiger: first, why does he jump through such small hoops, why does he use olive oil and why don't we see him jump through the hoops? The conditioner which Alex gives to Vitaly helps Vitaly to have a "healthy" coat, that is, the leadership in Russia isn't "greasy" like the olive oil, or going to "burn" the people because of corruption, but the coat has become more natural with the right "cleansing agent" that will help to strengthen it and make it strong.
Catholics will know that Our Lady of Fatima appeared in 1917 asking for prayers for the conversion of Russia. As Stefano is praying, it's at the same moment that Vitaly is trying to "be converted" from not jumping through his hoops anymore to jumping through them again. While Stefano messes up his prayers, he still wants to be able to pray, and Vitaly needs the prayers. Madagascar 3 is suggesting that we need to continue our prayers and that leads us to understanding who Vitaly is and his importance to "the circus."
Vitaly's original act was to jump through super small hoops after dumping olive oil on himself so he could get through, however, we the audience never saw it, just saw him on the other side. The hoops the Russian jumps through symbolizes the "tight squeezes" throughout Russian history that, somehow, they always managed to get through (consider the reign of Ivan the Terrible, the Napoleonic Wars, the October Revolution, World War I and World War II, the reign of Stalin, Chernobyl and then the transfer to a market economy); somehow, Russia always "squeezes by"; why don't we see it? The Iron Curtain hid most of Russia's activities, and they still aren't very trustful today, and that helps to explain why Vitaly dumps flammable olive oil over himself.
Where does olive oil originate? Greece. What is Greece known for? It's debt crisis caused by corrupt government officials hiding the real nature of their spending. Russia has the second most corrupt government in Europe (after Ukraine) and that is reflects part of the reason the country's GDP hasn't grown faster because other countries are simply afraid of the corruption of doing business with Russian officials, hence, when Vitaly pours olive oil (Greece's "greasy political practices") over himself he gets "burned" (the Russian economy lags behind and the people are hurt by the very practice they thought would protect them, the oil). This point is "vital" to make because it reminds us that it's not capitalism that is the cause of Russian economic woes, but their own corrupt leaders.
Why "can only people and penguins drive?" People because we invented cars and we have the necessary intellectual and physical means to do so; penguins because they work together as a team in unison while taking directions, which is why the penguins are so successful. Skipper is a "skipper" of the ship of state (the state of the penguins, at least) and his strong leadership allows each of them to be employed in what their strengths and talents are, as in Moneyball.
But Vitaly is also "vital" to the circus for another reason: the circus symbolizes capitalism in general, and the "trapeze Americano" is the "balancing act" America can do between the upper-classes and the middle-class self-realization (the circus re-inventing itself and getting to America)  and the turn-around in difference between the Soviet Union to Russia is vital to the international community in remembering the successes of what the market economy can do:
Since the turn of the 21st century, higher domestic consumption and greater political stability have bolstered economic growth in Russia. The country ended 2008 with its ninth straight year of growth, averaging 7% annually between 2000 and 2008. Real GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) was 19,840 in 2010. Growth was primarily driven by non-traded services and goods for the domestic market, as opposed to oil or mineral extraction and exports. The average nominal salary in Russia was $640 per month in early 2008, up from $80 in 2000. In the end of 2010 the average nominal monthly wages reached 21,192 RUR (or $750 USD), while tax on the income of individuals is payable at the rate of 13% on most incomes. Approximately 13.7% of Russians lived below the national poverty line in 2010 significantly down from 40% in 1998 at the worst point of the post-Soviet collapse. Unemployment in Russia was at 6% in 2007, down from about 12.4% in 1999. The middle class has grown from just 8 million persons in 2000 to 55 million persons in 2006 (Wikipedia).
Towards the end, the gang goes back to the zoo and Alex, the lion and "king" that DuBois wants beheaded (read: French Revolution), is about to get sawed in two. The circus animals that the gang has parted ways with have the choice of going to help Alex and the others or seeing to their own circus. The motto throughout the film is, "Circus sticks together," and when one of the animals suggests that Alex and the others were never really circus, Vitaly the Russian Tiger responds, "That's Bolshevik!" (as a play on the phrase "That's bullsh**!") and he's right: the circus, again, is a symbol for how capitalism works globally, and Vitaly saying that for him to not come to the aid of his capitalist friends is Bolshevik is Bolshevik. Skipper the penguin says, "I never thought I would say this on American soil, but the Russkie's right!" and that's because, by virtue of re-inventing himself, Vitaly can make the call that capitalists look out for each other, and that brings the penguins in line, too.
What got the gang and the circus to America, besides the clever re-inventing of themselves to be opposite the Cirque du Soleil (an all-human circus) to be an all animal circus, is the American investor looking to offer the circus a contract-tour through America if they can impress him. It's a great shot when Phil and Mason, dressed as the King of Versailles, stands beside the American investor with the deed between them in an obvious statement that America won't do to our upper-classes what the French Revolution did to theirs; but there's another reason for that as well.
Whether it's Gloria the hippo on the tightrope or Marty the Zebra being launched through the air, or Alex the lion on the trapeze, these animals are flying in a clear indication of "upward mobility," i.e., they are not bound by social structures the way a solid gold airplane is bound by the laws of physics to be unable to fly (the penguins want to be a solid gold airplane, not only revealing frivolity, but that there is a law of physics which contradicts capitalism's law of social and class mobility). The animals flying not only demonstrates how all of us in America can "reach for the stars," but also actually attain it.
In conclusion, Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted steps up to the plate to bat for capitalism. Every aspect of the film contributes to a anti-socialist agenda by showing honestly showing us the faults with capitalism and how it got in the state it's in (the penguins gambling spree) but how it can not only still work, but is the desirable state for America. I know I laughed more than the kids did, but just because it's an animated work, it's definitely one for adults, imparting a valuable lesson for us all.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

You are a genius. I never would have realized the truth behind this film (which I loved), but you're right.

The Fine Art Diner said...

I can't even BEGIN to thank you! I loved the film, too, and didn't expect to enjoy it, but so happy they made it! Thank you so much and VERY best wishes!

oBread Circus said...

amazing what have you here. just wondering since most of us watch these movies for entertainment does the massage really get to the masses when its so subtly presented, i say subtly because i would never have guessed idea behind.
thanks for openin our minds!

The Fine Art Diner said...

Dear OBread Circus,
That is an EXCELLENT question, especially given that--to be perfectly frank with you--Madagascar 3 is an animated film, generally intended for children and they are the real intended audience of this "message" (Ice Age 4, by the way, also animated, is the exact opposite of Madagascar 3, very liberal and socialist, and so, too, is Pirates! Band of Misfits, both of which I have posted on in this blog).
When we chose something we believe will be "entertaining," we have a whole list of "unconscious" or conscious decision-making qualities we run through before making a choice, e.g., a film that would be entertaining to my brother would probably not be entertaining to myself, and vice versa, because we "enjoy" different things, reflected in our choices of films. When we have chosen a film to go see, to invest our time and even our hope for entertainment, we either end up liking or disliking the film, and what causes that? Either the "possible world scenario" the narrative presents resonates with what we believe to be true (the message of Madagascar, for example) or we don't believe it to be true and (very simplistically) we don't like it. We don't have to engage and decode a film/work of art to approve its message and be influenced by it because that subtle influence, as you accurately pointed out, is exactly what the film makers want, to sway you without preaching or making a big speech, but convince you that they have the accurate view on reality (that's funny, isn't it, with dancing zoo animals and driving penguins, ha ha!); it's the same principles as a brand name product, Coke for example, being placed in a film for your subtle approval to later consume.
So, all the films, books, lit, music, poetry, etc., that we like, we like for how it validates our understanding of the universe, and we know it validates it because it has articulated what we did not articulate, for example, how capitalism is a circus and involves risks and sometimes people get hurt, but everyone is better off in the long-run; this makes films/art invaluable because it contains the gift of "self-knowledge" in helping us find our thoughts and what we believe to be true; decoding films/art as I do, is a basic attempt at furthering that self-knowledge and helping others to do the same.
Thank you so very much for taking the time to leave your kind comments, I hope this helps!

Anonymous said...

No a no a no a, you a silly Americano. That's all good and well, except with the Fed keeping interest rates at zero until 2015, it doesn't matter who is president, capitalism is already ruined.

The animals are all in cages, a symbol of slavery, capitalism and its richer cousin corporatocracy (fine apples and oranges) rely on slavery, at some level. If not why does the black market always dwarf the real GNP of the world, because sex, sex slaves and drugs, along with the guns and wars that go along with them are what really drives capitalism.

Madame Chantel is a loosely veiled Nazi and a reference to the French capitulation of occupied vichy france with a patina of Liberty Leading the People thrown on top.

Just as Goncharova still mocks our infatuation with Picasso, her version of Rayonism being the real force which creates postmodern thought and our postmodern world (not Picasso nor Virginia Wolff or Heidegger or Spinoza), it is a the adorable and lovable sea a lion Stefano who is at the heart of this movie, not the "vital" Vitaly as you claim.

And in order to deconstruct the cold war and realize it was the Nazi's playing us off of each other antebellum, and that the Marshall Plan was thinly veiled CIA pro-socialism and unionism over communism, this movie is really about how socialism saved the world, animals united working together.

Of course, this is all so "euro-centric" and perhaps it would be better to look at it from an afro-circus, er, afro-centric point of view?

The Pratico said...

I agree with you very much and I agree with our friend suggesting that it's socialism that brought Success. Capitalism is very much " A one man show " You look out for your self to help yourself succeed and follow your dreams. Sure you can help others on your way but theirs an alternate motive ( Buying the circus not to help them but to get back home ) In the End though The animals saw that they couldn't live a life of being restricted ( Communism ) But instead wanted a life where they could Fulfill their dreams yet still do it for the greater good , and where everyone was equal. There is no country in the world that has reached this level though some can say Canada is the closest we have right now ( as stated their " Cheap medicine " and " lax labor laws" being socialism but there is still a gap between the rich and the poor, being from capitalism ). I believe that the message, if any at all, would be that a balance of Freedom to work towards your dreams ( Capitalism ) , but helping each other and having that security of a safety net ( Socialism ) can work together. You still need to pay for a safety net and for the assurance of freedom but you will have it and it will be good and You can still be free.Stop complaining about taxes, yeah they are getting high but how else do you expect all the things your government gives you to be paid for? The government ( the previous owners of the circus ) may have had lot's of money to spend on them selves that came from you , but It will take nothing short of you working with everyone to out bid the government and take control of your future again. But you can't do it alone. It all shows that Aspects of Capitalism Work well with aspects of Socialism. As long as we aren't looking at Capitalism being a tall white hated Texan , and socialism looking like a peasant working on a lush field and eating dirt....

The Fine Art Diner said...

The Practico,
Thank you for taking the time to post your observations and insights into the film! I apologize for taking so long to get back with you, however, I have given thought to your views (specifically, whether or not I have mis-interpreted the film) and the basis for your own understanding. My conclusion is, that you are ignoring important aspects of the film in order to uphold socialism. Please understand, I thoroughly see films like Ice Age 4 as socialist, and Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter, Cloud Atlas, Lawless, The Hunger Games, and some others, but I can't see--unless one blatantly ignores large sections of the film--how on earth you can make Madagascar 3 a socialist film.
For example, towards the end, Vitaly blatantly and clearly states, "That's Bolshevik!" and further (I actually don't know if it made it into the DVD version or not, and was only included in versions being shown in the US) but at least twice, unionized labor laws are made fun of in Canada and the "working only 2 weeks a year" in France is mocked as well. Those are capitalist's positions, not socialist. If I saw socialist foundations, I wouldn't hesitate to say the film was socialist because so many people who read this blog don't want to go see a socialist film that will undermine their beliefs, so I sincerely strive for accuracy and, when the film is ambiguous, I point that out as well.
Again, I apologize for taking so long to reply, but I have given this quite a bit of thought and just don't see how you can account for those aspects of the film and still reach a pro-socialist interpretation of it, so if you can, please, do respond with your rebuttal because I would enjoy extending this discussion as deeply as possible!
Thanks and best wishes!

Anonymous said...

The main problem is that the respected writer, you hold capitalism very dearly and think that "Its not the fault of capitalism, but the fault of greed."

The movie is made by capitalist media so its obvious that they tried to show "capitalism is good in the end, and even when it has bad things its the best thing you can get in the end."



Your problem is most likely lack of understanding how capitalism works. You may try to read the communist manifesto for the starters and read the Capital 1,2 and 3(Thats an overkill I admit, but they are available for free in the net) Capitalism CAN NOT live without greed. The profit greed that is the attempt to maximize profit at any cost lies at the core of capitalist system. Those capitalists who cant be greedy enough fall from the competition.


The question is not what is portrayed in the movie, but the question is of proposing reformism.

You believe that capitalism was once a progressive ,good system...which is TRUE...but that was the time when it was freeing the world from feudal era. There was a huge market to capture and they were developing the productive forces. That day is GONE. It is not going to return since the wheel of time cant be turned back.


What you wrongly assume is that the capitalism can be "reformed " into some more humane system where things will go on smoothly. Capitalism has run its course in history. Its not going to fall apart by itself, but its NOT going to improve the world any more.


You want proof? Have you seen capitalism developing the productive forces? Is the demand low? Not at all! People would like to have the goodness of commodities....but they lack the money....thereby Effective demand is low, which is another word for excess capacity. Since this capacity is excess, this will be discarded by running factories at suboptimal rate, sacking workers, closing factories and most importantly not investing much.


Capitalism is not going to develop productive forces for a long time , and even if it does in distant future it will be only at the cost of another greater recession.


Capitalism is NOT dead. Its in its last part of life, and now having organ failures. It can live through agony for long years...but to believe that it can be young again is utopia.

(Sure it can recover, but that needs a huge new market to open up...and that recovery too is temporary.


Anonymous said...

BTW have you noticed the red army choir like tune (and also the red banners) that plays behind the Tiger after he completes the hoop a second time after Alex talks to him that they all need him to do what he did once again?




It could be the symbolization of correcting the wrong theories of stalinism, reinventing the socialism(conditioning) and completing the revolution, symbolized by the burning hoop.
However its completely unlikely by the capitalist media.



However coming back to the point about capitalism , corruption is the byproduct of capitalism and bureaucracy, and mostly capitalism itself. In those nations where its heaven for capitalism it would be legal to bribe politicians which is corruption in other nations.

Like in USA lobbying is legal. consider if that was illegal how much corruption would there be?

Low corruption in a capitalist system usually indicates that the legal system there is very capital friendly and whatever is necessary for maximization of profit can be done legally.



Now come to socialism ,and communism.

What failed in USSR?


Answer is very simple. Dictatorship of proletariat is NOT dictatorship of the leadership of the vanguard party for the proletariat. In short they screwed it up there by transferring power from soviets to bureaucrats and then Stalin. Socialism cant be a one man show. Hence it failed.People dont liberate themselves to be told whats right from above. They took away the life blood of socialism away from it that is called democracy. Workers democracy, which means not only the peoples voice should count, but also the means for working on the voice raised by the people be in control of the people.

Both of them were lost in last phase of USSR.


What you have noticed in the movie is very good , however I doubt that much of it has been thorough either subconscious during making, or we are applying our sub and conscious to find things that we seek. Like the "losing " the prayer phrases....which might have been used to denote nervousness.


I would also request you to see here for more info on the capitalism,


http://www.cpim.org/marxist/201104-Prakash.pdf

Which deals with the subject of crisis

http://www.cpim.org/marxist/

for other references if you are interested


and on reformism its this one


http://www.marxist.com/capitalist-crisis-marxism-reformism.htm

(this latter one is Trotskyist)

Anonymous said...

However its important to note thet a portion of the bourgeoise during the time of crisis may detach itself from the other portion to take side towards the proletarian classes. The film is an animation from dreamworks, highly known for depicting everything in a satire , humor or parody.

Secondly I think it could be so that what I thought as your view may actually be the view that you interpreted for the movie. In that case sorry for taking you as a reformist.






What I believe that what this movie depicted is a complex sceanario with lots of view told and lots of interpretations.


Alex view point is that of a common good guy american, who wants to get home, get everybody together, wants to make a world where all are happy...like that.



The penguines and monkeys are the capitalists, they want to make money, gamble and stuff..businessmen,while other monkeys as the workers.


The Tiger Vital is the Socialist, sad after his failure, eventually cleaning himself of errors and doing what he was supposed to do long ego, this time succeeding after correction....


The sea lion is the average god fearing people from deprived nations....Latin America or Mexico...he wants socialism to succeed and this time clearing itself from past mistakes..



The joined message here is international cooperation of people from different nations....Russia, Usa, Latin America, ..

They proposed reformism though.


The Fine Art Diner said...

Dear Anonymous Socialist,
I am happy to admit when I am wrong, but I'm not on this film. There are two imperative facts of the film you overlook: first, Vitaly, which we both agree is Russian, says, "That's Bolshevik!" and anyone who knows what "Bolshevik" means knows it's a referece to the REAL WORLD APPLICATION of the writings of socilaists to REALITY, not the kind of ivory tower, throw-out-everything-that-doesn't-support-our-Gospel-of-Marx-theories, but what actually happens when socialism/communism comes to power: Stalin, Chavez, Castro, the North Korean dictators, the Gang of 4 from China, etc. THAT IS SOCIALISM BECAUSE ONLY HALF-INTELLIGENT PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF BELIEVE IN IT!!!!! Secondly, Vitaly using the word "Bolshevik" demonstrates that the film makers were consciously aware of what they are doing and saying; you don't use the word "Bolshevik" in a children's film unless it's the adults you want to communicate with! Thirdly, where Vitaly says "Bolshevik" is where the word "Bullshit" would have fit in instead, consciously correlating that Bolsheviks and Bullshit are one and the same, totally capable of one taking the place of the other.
The second fact you are intentionally omitting is the PURPOSE TO RETURN TO NEW YORK! The center of international capitalism! The third fact you are ignoring is the French "detective" trying to kill them: if they were socialists, why would she be after them? Just as socialists tend to overlook anything that doesn't support their theories, so you are transferring that same habit to this film. Without a doubt, Madagascar 3 is a pro-capitalist film and Forbes magazine--also pro-capitalist--agrees with me because they quoted me (the original article has from January has been archived but it's at this link:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/modeledbehavior/2013/01/31/questions-rarely-asked/
Films like Ice Age 4, The Vow, Lawless, The Croods, Cloud Atlas, Hotel Transylvania and Pirates! Band Of Misfits ARE PRO-SOCIALIST and I clearly state that in my reviews of them, but Madagascar 3 isn't unless you cut out half the film.